Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543682›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026

Structure-preserving Image-quality Enhancement for 3D Synthetic FLAIR Using a 3D U-Net with Content and Style Losses.

Satoru Kamio, Akifumi Hagiwara, Yujiro Otsuka, Moto Nakaya, Reina Hosoi, Yasunobu Hoshino, Yuji Tomizawa, Yuika Tsukamoto, Naohisa Hara, Junko Kikuta and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Satoru KamioDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-1508
Akifumi HagiwaraDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-3249
Yujiro OtsukaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Moto NakayaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-6286
Reina HosoiDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasunobu HoshinoDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0018-6728
Yuji TomizawaDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-6725
Yuika TsukamotoDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naohisa HaraDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko KikutaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1324-8614
Christina AndicaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-6950
Toshiaki AkashiDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-0792
Akihiko WadaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3432-0267
Hiroshi KusaharaCanon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara Tochigi, Japan.
Ryutaro YanoCanon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara Tochigi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1938-141X
Taku HatanoDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-0444
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-2629
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-218X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSynthetic MRI can generate multiple contrasts from a single acquisition, yet synthetic fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) generally shows lower quality than conventional FLAIR. We aimed to improve 3D synthetic FLAIR image quality using deep learning, without losing the scan-time advantage of synthetic MRI.

methodsWe studied 55 adults with inflammatory demyelinating diseases who underwent 3T MRI. For each participant, five 3D quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation (3D-QALAS) source images and a conventional 3D-FLAIR image were acquired, and a synthetic FLAIR image was generated from the 3D-QALAS data. We trained a deep learning model in which a 3D U-shaped convolutional network (U-Net)-based attention network predicted voxel-wise weights for generating FLAIR images from the five 3D-QALAS source images, using conventional 3D-FLAIR images as the reference. The model was trained with a combined loss function of mean squared error, content loss, and style loss. Agreement with the reference was assessed using image similarity and error metrics, lesion overlap using the Dice similarity coefficient, and overall image quality and focal lesion visibility using blinded radiologist ratings. Synthetic FLAIR and the deep learning-generated FLAIR images were compared using 2-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe deep learning-generated FLAIR images showed significantly higher agreement with the reference image than synthetic FLAIR images (all P < 0.001). Lesion overlap was higher with the deep learning-generated FLAIR images (median [interquartile range]: 0.642 [0.528-0.711] versus 0.487 [0.344-0.641]). Qualitatively, the deep learning-generated FLAIR images improved overall image quality and focal lesion visibility, but reader scores remained lower than those for the reference conventional 3D-FLAIR images (all P < 0.001).

conclusionA deep learning-based approach applied to five 3D-QALAS source images improved the image quality of 3D synthetic FLAIR. These improvements may increase the clinical utility of 3D synthetic MRI for neuroradiologic assessment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDemyelinating DiseasesImage EnhancementImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle Aged3D U-Netdeep learningdemyelinating diseasefluid-attenuated inversion recoverysynthetic magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42543682
PMCPMC13683563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.