ArticleClinical and translational allergy2026
Criteria for Control and Remission of Respiratory Allergic Disease With Allergen Immunotherapy: A Delphi Consensus.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Criteria for Control and Remission of Respiratory Allergic Disease With Allergen Immunotherapy: A Delphi Consensus.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAllergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma are prevalent IgE-mediated respiratory diseases that frequently coexist and impair quality of life. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has clinical benefits and potential disease-modifying effects. Until recently, standardised definitions of disease control and remission were lacking in routine clinical practice, particularly for allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. This study aimed to propose preliminary definitions of control and remission in patients receiving AIT and to assess expert consensus using the Delphi methodology.
methodsA scientific committee developed a survey based on a literature review and expert input, addressing symptoms, medication use, quality of life, exacerbations and tools for objective and subjective assessment. Forty allergists participated in a two-round Delphi study. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70% agreement on a 9-point Likert scale.
resultsConsensus was achieved for all items after two rounds. The panel agreed on proposed definitions of disease control and clinical remission for allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma in the context of AIT, integrating symptom severity, medication use, validated questionnaires and objective measures.
conclusionsThis study presents preliminary expert-consensus definitions of control and remission in allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma in patients undergoing AIT. These definitions should not be interpreted as validated clinical criteria or endpoints. As a preliminary proposal, they aim to provide a structured approach for assessing treatment response in clinical practice by integrating symptom burden, medication use, patient-reported outcomes and objective measures. They should be regarded as an initial conceptual step, and further prospective studies are needed to validate these criteria and confirm their relevance, feasibility and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.