Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543455›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

Early Effects of Communities That Care on System Transformation: a Non-randomized Community Trial in Germany.

Dominik Röding, Isabell von Holt, Lea Decker, Ulla Walter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik RödingHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany. roeding.dominik@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-5679
Isabell von HoltHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4289-7635
Lea DeckerHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2983-7051
Ulla WalterHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-2206

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EL2006ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EL2006B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community coalition approaches such as Communities That Care (CTC) are regarded as key strategies for translating prevention science into community-level improvements in youth outcomes. It was shown that CTC improves three system transformation outcomes. The present study aimed to conceptually replicate these findings in the German context under the highly unusual real-world implementation constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. A non-randomized community trial was carried out (2020-2023) in 22 a priori matched community-pairs from four German states. In an open cohort design, community key informants were surveyed at two time points. A total of 318 key informants from 18 ICs (n = 180) and 11 CCs (n = 138) were included in the open-cohort analyses. Outcomes included (1) adoption of a science-based approach to prevention (primary outcome), (2) sectorial collaboration (SC) for prevention, and (3) prevention collaboration (PC). Three-level mixed models were used to analyse changes over time. In addition to replicating the original binary comparison of intervention communities (ICs) and comparison communities (CCs), analyses were extended to account for heterogeneity in implementation progress across ICs resulting from pandemic-related implementation disruptions. At baseline, ICs showed significantly higher levels of SC than CCs (γ = 0.383, SE = 0.124, p = .003), whereas no significant baseline differences were observed for Adoption or SC. Compared with CCs, ICs showed a non-significant increase in the primary outcome (b = 0.272, SE = 2.306, p = .906) and PC (γ = 0.78, SE = 0.121, p = .523), whereas SC showed a non-significant decrease over time in ICs relative to CCs (γ = - 0.193, SE = 0.118, p = .107). Implementation progress was not significantly associated with changes in the primary outcome (b = 0.401, SE = 0.929, p = .666), SC (γ = 0.082, SE = 0.100, p = .415), or PC (γ = 0.018, SE = 0.094, p = .847). Sensitivity analyses based on panel data and non-imputed datasets yielded largely comparable findings. No significant effects on system transformation were observed. However, given the limited implementation progress under COVID-19 conditions, longer follow-up may be needed to assess whether CTC can achieve system-level change in Germany. 

trial registrationThis study was registered with German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00022819 on Aug 18, 2021.

Indexed as

AdolescentsCapacity buildingCommunity capacityCommunity coalitionEvidence-based preventionProblem behaviorTranslational research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.