Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543430›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Aberrant ICA in the middle ear.

Mugurel Constantin Rusu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mugurel Constantin RusuDivision of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, 020021, Romania. mugurel.rusu@umfcd.ro.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-0540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An aberrant internal carotid artery (a-ICA) in the middle ear is rare, but it may be injured during routine otological procedures. This review examines 48 publications on its embryological basis, clinical presentation, imaging diagnosis, and management. The a-ICA results from agenesis of the first embryonic segment of the internal carotid artery, with collateralisation through the inferior tympanic artery. Presentation is often non-specific; hearing loss (47.7%) and pulsatile tinnitus (30.0%) are the most frequent symptoms. Otoscopy may show a pulsatile retrotympanic mass in the anteroinferior quadrant. High-resolution computed tomography is central to diagnosis; relevant features include absence of the normal vertical carotid canal and its exocranial opening, and enlargement of the inferior tympanic canaliculus. The a-ICA must be distinguished from the more common lateralised petrous ICA variant, which retains a normal proximal calibre and enters the anterior mesotympanum without involving the inferior tympanic canaliculus. In iatrogenic injury, immediate packing is followed by definitive treatment in most reported cases; endovascular approaches have fewer complications than surgical ligation. Preoperative recognition remains one of the main safeguards against severe haemorrhage and neurological sequelae.

Indexed as

Aberrant internal carotid arteryCarotid canal dehiscenceHigh-resolution computed tomographyIatrogenic vascular injuryLateralised petrous internal carotid arteryMiddle earMyringotomyPulsatile tinnitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.