Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543422›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Reconsidering surgical thresholds for stapedotomy: multicenter outcome analysis.

Matteo Di Bari, Martina Sebastiani, Hugo Delille, Luca Canali, Raoul Nucci, Annalisa Pianese, Giovanni Cristalli, Arturo Mario Poletti, Olivier Sterkers, Daniele Bernardeschi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matteo Di BariOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, Legnano, MI, 20025, Italy.
Martina SebastianiHumanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, Pieve Emanuele, MI, 20090, Italy. martina.sebastiani98@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6088-5319
Hugo DelilleService d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP- HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75013, France.
Luca CanaliHumanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, Pieve Emanuele, MI, 20090, Italy.
Raoul NucciOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, Legnano, MI, 20025, Italy.
Annalisa PianeseOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, Legnano, MI, 20025, Italy.
Giovanni CristalliDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Children's Hospital "Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù-IRCCS", Rome, 00165, Italy.
Arturo Mario PolettiENT Department, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Olivier SterkersService d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP- HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75013, France.
Daniele BernardeschiService d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP- HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75013, France.
Giovanni ColomboOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, Legnano, MI, 20025, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStapedotomy provides excellent audiological outcomes in otosclerosis, yet no universally accepted criteria exist for surgical indication. Current recommendations vary substantially across countries, particularly regarding audiometric thresholds. This study aimed to evaluate whether performing stapedotomy at lower preoperative hearing thresholds compromises postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted including adult patients undergoing primary stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric data were collected according to AAO-HNS reporting guidelines. Patients were stratified according to preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) thresholds (≤ 20 vs. > 20 dB; ≤30 vs. > 30 dB), with additional subgroup analyses based on pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds (≤ 30 vs. > 30 dB; ≤40 vs. > 40 dB). Postoperative ABG and complication rates were compared between subgroups.

resultsA total of 615 stapedotomies were included. Median postoperative ABG was 5 dB (IQR 2.5-8.1), with significant improvement in all audiometric parameters (p < 0.0001). Patients operated at lower preoperative ABG thresholds achieved postoperative ABG values comparable to those with larger gaps. Using a 30 dB threshold, slightly better postoperative ABG closure was observed in patients with smaller preoperative conductive components (p = 0.017). Similar findings were confirmed in analyses based on PTA thresholds. Complication rates were low and did not significantly differ across audiometric subgroups.

conclusionStapedotomy provides excellent postoperative hearing outcomes across a broad range of preoperative hearing levels. Earlier surgical intervention in patients with smaller air-bone gaps does not appear to compromise audiological results or increase complication rates. These findings question the need for rigid threshold-based surgical indications and support a more individualized, patient-centered approach to timing of surgery.

Indexed as

Hearing outcomesLaserOtosclerosisStapedotomySurgical indication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.