ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Applicability and reliability of the IDDSI functional diet scale (IDDSI-FDS) in clinical reports of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Functional Diet Scale (IDDSI-FDS) was developed to quantify functional oral intake within the IDDSI framework. Although promising, evidence supporting its use in routine clinical documentation remains limited. This study aimed to examine the applicability of the IDDSI-FDS when retrospectively applied to medical reports of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
methodsMedical reports were randomly selected from 200 Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) examinations performed between January 2024 and September 2025 at a tertiary-care hospital. Three trained raters independently classified each report using IDDSI levels for solids and liquids, the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and the corresponding IDDSI-FDS score. After two weeks, raters repeated the classifications under blinded, randomized conditions. Applicability was assessed through classifiable proportion and time required per classification.
resultsReliability was examined using weighted Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC2 (inter- and intra-rater), while convergent validity was assessed via Spearman correlation between FOIS and IDDSI-FDS. Of the 71 initially selected reports, 67 (94.4%) were classifiable after excluding 4 due to incomplete dietary information, confirming high applicability of the scale to standard clinical documentation. Mean classification time was 64 ± 8 s per case. Inter-rater agreement was almost perfect for FOIS (κ range: 0.991-0.996, AC2: 0.991- 0.996) and perfect for IDDSI-FDS (κ = 1.00, AC2 = 1.00 for all comparisons). Intra-rater reliability was perfect across all raters and both scales (κ = 1.00; AC2 = 1.00). FOIS and IDDSI-FDS showed strong positive correlation in both assessment rounds (ρ = 0.850, p < .001), demonstrating excellent convergent validity. The IDDSI-FDS can be reliably derived from retrospective FEES documentation, with perfect intra-rater stability and near-perfect inter-rater agreement. Its strong correlation with FOIS supports the functional validity of the scale. These findings indicate that the IDDSI-FDS is a practical, standardizable, and clinically robust tool for documenting dietary recommendations in oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42543420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.