ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Cadaveric analysis of periosteal temperature response across skin types in facial tissues using a multi-wavelength diode laser.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy-based devices are often applied to the midface using uniform treatment parameters despite interindividual variability in facial anatomy and skin pigmentation. For bulk-heating technologies, clinical relevance depends not only on superficial heating but also on the timing and magnitude of temperature rise at deeper tissue planes, as periosteal thermal exposure in the malar cheek may influence procedural safety and discomfort. This study aimed to quantify time to periosteal temperature rise in the malar cheek and to compare this parameter between Fitzpatrick skin types I-II and III-IV. This cadaveric study was conducted using four human hemifaces representing Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV, grouped into I-II and III-IV. A multi-wavelength diode laser was applied to a malar cheek region using a stacking technique. Periosteal temperature at the zygomatic bone was measured with a thermocouple. Time to periosteal temperature rise was defined as the elapsed time from laser activation to the first sustained periosteal temperature increase of ≥ 0.5 °C above baseline. Mean time to periosteal temperature rise was longer in Fitzpatrick I-II specimens (6.4 ± 0.5 s) than in Fitzpatrick III-IV specimens (4.7 ± 0.4 s). Peak temperatures were higher in Fitzpatrick III-IV (68-71 °C) than in Fitzpatrick I-II (58-62 °C). Fitzpatrick III-IV specimens showed earlier periosteal temperature rise and higher peak periosteal temperatures under identical delivery settings, supporting skin type-dependent differences in deep thermal response during stacking delivery of a multi-wavelength diode laser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.