SynthesisJournal of gastroenterology2026
S1P receptor modulators for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsS1P receptor modulators are emerging oral therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC); however, a comprehensive synthesis incorporating the largest number of RCTs to date, alongside Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) and GRADE-based certainty assessment, remains lacking. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S1P receptor modulators in moderate-to-severe UC and assess the conclusiveness and certainty of the evidence.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar were searched from inception through February 28, 2026. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing any S1P receptor modulator with placebo in adults (≥ 18 years) with UC. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using a random-effects model.
resultsA total of ten RCTs were included. During induction, S1P receptor modulators were superior to placebo for clinical remission (RR 2.77; 95% CI, 2.17-3.55; I
conclusionS1P receptor modulators demonstrated moderate-to-high certainty evidence of efficacy across all outcomes, without a significant increase in SAEs. These findings provide robust quantitative support for current guideline recommendations endorsing this oral drug class as an effective advanced therapy for moderate-to-severe UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42543388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.