Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542980›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Support in the Shadows: Findings From a Qualitative Study Exploring Fathers' and Non-Birthing Partners' Perceptions and Experiences of Support During a Termination for Medical Reasons.

Sarah Fogarty, Kirstin Tindal, Alexander E P Heazell, Niki Munk, Frances M Boyle, Phillipa Hay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah FogartySchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6358-5873
Kirstin TindalCentre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Alexander E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-7845
Niki MunkSchool of Health & Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0099-8440
Frances M BoyleCentre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1665-2137
Phillipa HayTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-6856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTermination for medical reasons (TFMR) is an essential aspect of reproductive healthcare. While physical and emotional care of the birthing parent is central within healthcare systems, less is known about the experiences and support needs of non-birthing partners during this process.

objectiveTo explore fathers' and non-birthing partners' perceptions and experiences of support (covering clinical, psychological, and social support) during a TFMR.

designA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND

participantsTen fathers/non-birthing partners who had experienced TFMR in the last 7 years, identified via social media or snowball sampling, were interviewed. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis and a mixture of semantic and latent coding of the data.

resultsAn overarching theme of Support in the shadows was identified, capturing how non-birthing partners were consistently present but rarely the focus of explicit or sustained care or support. Three themes were developed under the main theme of support in the shadows: (a) Feeling invisible, (b) seeking whole-person support and (c) partners as a support rather than being supported. DISCUSSION: In common with other forms of pregnancy loss, fathers/non-birthing partners described a pattern of silent responsibility, emotional invisibility and a lack of meaningful recognition of their needs. When care was individualised and specific to non-birthing partners, it was experienced as supportive.

conclusionsThe support that fathers/non-birthing partners experienced during TFMR was largely incidental rather than embedded. Partners desired care and support that was deliberate, inclusive and individualised and covered clinical, psychological and social aspects. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A parent with lived experience of TFMR was involved in the study conception and methodology. The lived experience parent advised on study design and the presentation of participant information. Parents who had lived experience of TFMR in the last 7 years were interviewed for the study as participants.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFathersSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePregnancyQualitative Researchfathersnon‐birthing partnerspartnerstermination for foetal abnormalitiestermination for medical reasons

Identifiers

PMID42542980
PMCPMC13429099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.