ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Improving the Safety and Quality of Care for Children and Young People With Intellectual and Developmental Disability. The Motivated for Change Programme in a Paediatric Emergency Department Setting. A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren and young people with intellectual and developmental disability have long been known to suffer from inequities in accessing safe and quality health care. These challenges are most felt within the emergency department due to its busy, crowded, and overstimulating environments with staff that are not trained to provide reasonably adjusted care.
aimsThe study is an evaluation using qualitative and quantitative methods of a continuing education and quality improvement programme designed to increase the knowledge, skills, and confidence of healthcare staff in providing reasonable adjustments to children and young people with intellectual disability in hospitals.
methodsThis study evaluated the Motivated for Change programme, which uses Behavioural change, Adult Learning, and Quality Improvement strategies to drive practice change and service improvement. A hundred and thirty-one and 89 staff participated in a pre- and post-intervention survey. Interviews were conducted with parents of children and young people with intellectual and developmental disability attending the emergency department. Observational studies were also conducted in the pre- and post-intervention phase. These were transcribed, categorised, and coded with themes derived. Consensus was reached through meetings with the research team.
resultsThe Motivated for Change programme has demonstrated significant increases in staff knowledge, skills, and experience in providing safe and quality care for these children and young people. Evidence of change is reflected in the parent and staff interview and observational study themes. In addition, staff were further motivated to undertake quality improvement projects, develop an in-house training programme to provide ongoing training for new staff, and make further improvements in the department.
conclusionsThe Motivated for Change programme has demonstrated its efficacy in enabling changes in the practice of reasonable adjustments and the emergence of local champions for sustained efforts for ongoing improvements in safety and quality of care. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: The development of the research question and outcome measures was informed by data from previous research publications involving parents and staff. We sought input from a parent advisory committee in the design of the study. Parents were not involved in the recruitment and conduct of the study. Results were presented to the parent advisory at the end of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.