Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542964›Full record

ReviewThe Prostate2026

Management of De Novo miN1 Prostate Cancer in the PSMA-PET Era.

Thomas McMaster, Caitlin Ying Ming Louey, Jordan Santucci, Chloe Hobson, David D Chen, Niranjan Sathianathen, Joseph Ischia, Damien M Bolton, Nathan Lawrentschuck, Declan G Murphy and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Prostate, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thomas McMasterDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8558-7028
Caitlin Ying Ming LoueyDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-2072-2755
Jordan SantucciDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-7215
Chloe HobsonDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David D ChenDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Niranjan SathianathenDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-014X
Joseph IschiaDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Damien M BoltonDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5145-6783
Nathan LawrentschuckDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Declan G MurphyDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7500-5899
Shankar SivaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-0658
Marlon PereraDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is reshaping nodal staging in prostate cancer by detecting regional lymph node metastases with greater accuracy than conventional imaging. This has created a new cohort of patients with N1M0 disease detectable only on advanced imaging, raising important questions regarding prognosis, treatment intensification and the applicability of historical management paradigms derived from conventional imaging. The aim of this review is to consider de novo N1M0 management on PSMA-PET and current evidence.

methodsA comprehensive review of the literature was performed using Medline, PubMed and Web of Science. Search terms included combinations of "N1M0", "prostate cancer", "PSMA", "PET", "lymph node" and "metastasis". English-language studies and relevant reference lists were reviewed, with interpretation focused on diagnostic performance, stage migration and management implications of PSMA-PET-detected nodal disease.

resultsPSMA-PET outperforms conventional imaging for nodal staging, improving diagnostic confidence and frequently altering management. However, sensitivity for small-volume nodal disease remains imperfect, limiting exclusion of microscopic metastases. Emerging data suggest PSMA-PET drives stage migration whilst influencing use of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy to better tailor treatment fields. However, high-level prospective evidence demonstrating improved long-term oncological outcomes remains limited.

conclusionsPSMA-PET is a practice-changing staging modality in N1M0 prostate cancer, but whether earlier detection and treatment escalation translate into meaningful survival benefit remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIoligometastaticprostate cancerprostatectomyPSMA‐PETradiation

Identifiers

PMID42542964
PMCPMC13526415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.