ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026
Invisible Hands Behind Clean Hands: Procurement Justice, Materiality, and Nursing Praxis.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nursing ethics has long taken the bedside encounter as the moral center of practice. Yet this focus becomes incomplete when the material conditions of care are treated as ethically external to nursing itself. Ordinary clinical supplies such as gloves, masks, gowns, syringes, drapes, and linens are commonly understood as neutral instruments of safe and competent care. This paper argues that such neutrality is philosophically misleading. The materials through which nursing is enacted are embedded in global systems of labor, extraction, manufacture, circulation, use, and disposal that may involve exploitation, ecological degradation, and unequal distributions of risk. Using gloves and personal protective equipment as an entry point, this paper asks: To what extent are nurses ethically responsible for challenging the use of clinical supplies produced through labor exploitation or environmental injustice? Drawing on feminist political economy, care ethics, and materiality-oriented perspectives, I argue that care is not only an interpersonal act but also a relational, material, and politically organized practice. From this standpoint, procurement is part of nursing's moral field rather than a merely managerial concern. The paper advances a bounded account of professional responsibility grounded in epistemic attentiveness, discursive engagement, advocacy, and collective political action. A nursing philosophy of procurement justice enlarges, rather than dilutes, the meaning of care, responsibility, and advocacy. If nursing remains committed to dignity, justice, and the reduction of harm, it cannot regard the workers and communities who materially sustain care as ethically invisible. Nursing ethics must therefore extend beyond the bedside into the hidden infrastructures through which care becomes possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.