Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542959›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

Professional Segmentation as a Barrier to Reform in Turkish Nursing.

Zuleyha Inceoz, David Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zuleyha InceozSwansea University School of Health & Social Care, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-9019
David HughesSwansea University School of Health & Social Care, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-7763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper argues that segmentation within Turkish nursing is a major factor holding back the modernisation of nurse management. Since the millennium Türkiye's healthcare system has been transformed by NPM-style reforms that changed financing mechanisms and strengthened aspects of performance management, but had only limited impact on nursing management. The entrenched power of the medical profession and persisting influence of a civil service 'officer culture' have been major obstacles to change, but a third factor is division within the nursing workforce. Our qualitative study identifies four orientations among hospital nurses. Plans for innovation proposed by bureaucratic modernisers and professional modernisers are resisted by traditionalists and pragmatists, and modernisers themselves disagree about the way forward. Western discourses concerning nurse professionalisation and leadership have had uneven impact. Interdisciplinary working is largely absent, as are the hybrid management/clinical roles and movement of nurses into executive management positions. Instead, nurse managers seek to advance a curtailed form of professional development centring of continuing professional education, evidence-based practice, guideline development and creating spaces to exercise limited autonomy. Given the huge political difficulties of reducing medical power and achieving civil service reform, the best prospect of progress is to address the tensions within nursing itself.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformNurse AdministratorsHumansLeadershipQualitative ResearchTurkeycivil service culturemedical dominancenurse managementprofessionalisationprofessional segmentationTurkeyTürkiye

Identifiers

PMID42542959
PMCPMC13429039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.