Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542956›Full record

ReviewNursing inquiry2026

Past, Present and Future: A Historical Analysis and Reflection of 100 Years of Nursing Leadership.

Sherrie Bolton, Amy-Louise Byrne, Lisa Wirihana, Justine Connor, Ellie Cutmore

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sherrie BoltonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1307-442X
Amy-Louise ByrneSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8679-8310
Lisa WirihanaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-9898
Justine ConnorSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-3597
Ellie CutmoreSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-7595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper critically examines the evolution of nursing leadership over the past century, exploring how changing historical, social and professional contexts have influenced styles and their ongoing relevance to contemporary nursing practice. Using a historical analysis guided by Lewenson and Hermann's framework, primary sources, including archival materials and foundational texts, were examined alongside secondary scholarly literature and historical commentaries. Leadership approaches were reviewed by decade and mapped against key nursing theories, healthcare developments and broader social movements to construct a timeline of leadership discourse. Findings demonstrate a progression from predominantly hierarchical, autocratic and bureaucratic leadership models characteristic of the early and mid-20th century, particularly during wartime and post-war periods, toward more relational, collaborative and adaptive approaches. Transformational leadership emerged alongside nursing professionalisation during the 1980s, while servant and authentic leadership gained prominence in response to growing emphasis on equity, inclusion and person-centred care in the 2010s. More recently, adaptive, emotionally intelligent and ambidextrous leadership styles have become increasingly important for addressing healthcare complexity, workforce resilience, innovation and change. The analysis highlights nursing leadership as a dynamic, context-dependent and deeply relational construct. Understanding its evolution can support nurse leaders, educators and other healthcare providers to critically reflect on practice, foster inclusive and resilient teams and apply evidence-informed leadership strategies that promote sustainable, patient-centred care in rapidly changing healthcare environments.

Indexed as

History of NursingLeadershipHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumanshistorical analysisleadershipleadership stylesleadership theoriesnursing historynursing leadership

Identifiers

PMID42542956
PMCPMC13429045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.