Trial reportAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026
Cognitive Performance in Young Adults During Three Consecutive Days of Simulated Occupational Heat Stress: An Exploratory Study.
Trial report in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGlobal increases in occupational heat exposure are raising concerns about worker safety and cognitive performance during prolonged and repeated shifts. At present, the cumulative effects of repeated heat exposure on cognitive performance remain unclear. This exploratory study examined cognitive performance and perceived workload across three consecutive days of simulated occupational heat stress.
methodsTwenty physically active adults (age: 27 ± 6 years [5 female]) completed two randomized crossover trials comprising three consecutive 8-h workdays under hot (35°C; 63% RH; WBGT 31°C) and control (18°C; 53% RH; WBGT 14°C) conditions wearing minimal clothing (< 1 Clo). Participants performed moderate-intensity physical work (~4.3 METs) using a 30-min work:30-min rest schedule. Cognitive performance was assessed at start-of-day, midday, and end-of-day using the Joggle Research battery, evaluating sensorimotor speed, processing speed, and attention, visuospatial perception, sustained attention, and visual memory. Perceived workload was assessed at start-of-day and end-of-day using the NASA Task Load Index.
resultsCognitive performance was largely preserved across domains within and across repeated workdays, with no evidence of cumulative impairment (p ≥ 0.170). Unexpectedly, sustained attention improved in the heat. Perceived physical workload was higher in the heat, while perceived mental workload was unchanged.
conclusionsUnder prescribed work-rest conditions, cognitive performance appears to be maintained across consecutive days of occupational heat exposure in young, physically active adults. Future work should explore the relationship between heat and cognition in larger, more diverse work populations and in more challenging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42542901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.