ReviewRevista Cuidarte
Second victim: a concept analysis based on Rodgers' evolutionary model.
Review in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare-related incidents affect both patients and professionals involved. The impact on these professionals, known as "second victims," is one of the major hidden burdens of harm. Objective: To analyze the concept of the "second victim" from Rodgers' evolutionary perspective. Materials and Methods: This study conducted a concept analysis based on Rodgers' evolutionary perspective, using a scoping review to identify attributes, antecedents, consequences, surrogate terms, and related concepts associated with the "second victim" concept. Results: The attributes of the "second victim" concept involve persistent physical, emotional, and psychological consequences. Antecedents include a punitive culture and a lack of institutional and peer support. Consequences include sleep disorders, anger, fear, sadness, shame, intrusive memories, anxiety, depression, isolation, absenteeism, and leaving the profession. Related terms include patient safety and mental health, while surrogate terms include the "second victim phenomenon" and "second victim syndrome". Discussion: Punitive environments exacerbate negative impacts, undermine patient safety, promote error concealment, and increase underreporting, thereby hindering organizational learning and the correction of failures. Conclusion: The "second victim" concept refers to healthcare workers, scholars, and administrative or support staff who are directly or indirectly involved in patient care and who, when involved in an unintentional healthcare-related incident, manifest physical, emotional, and psychological reactions with repercussions across biopsychosocial, ethical, and legal dimensions. Without adequate and timely support, these reactions can become chronic and, eventually, pathological.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.