Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542892›Full record

ReviewRevista Cuidarte

Second victim: a concept analysis based on Rodgers' evolutionary model.

Matheus Tavares França da Silva, Caroliny Cristine Dos Santos Mendes, Rebeca Furtado Fernandes, Sherida Karanini Paz de Oliveira, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matheus Tavares França da SilvaMaster's student, Graduate Program in Clinical Nursing and Health Care, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. Email: matheus.tavares@aluno.uece.br Universidade Estadual do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil matheus.tavares@aluno.uece.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-0115
Caroliny Cristine Dos Santos MendesRegistered Nurse, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. E-mail: carolcmendes12@gmail.com Universidade Estadual do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil carolcmendes12@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8511-3471
Rebeca Furtado FernandesMaster's student, Graduate Program in Clinical Care in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. E-mail: rebeca.furtado@aluno.uece.br Universidade Estadual do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil rebeca.furtado@aluno.uece.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-0202
Sherida Karanini Paz de OliveiraPhD, Professor, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. Email: karanini@yahoo.com.br Universidade Estadual do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil karanini@yahoo.com.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-8046
Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de CarvalhoPhD, Professor, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. Email: rhanna.lima@uece.br Universidade Estadual do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil rhanna.lima@uece.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3406-9685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare-related incidents affect both patients and professionals involved. The impact on these professionals, known as "second victims," is one of the major hidden burdens of harm. Objective: To analyze the concept of the "second victim" from Rodgers' evolutionary perspective. Materials and Methods: This study conducted a concept analysis based on Rodgers' evolutionary perspective, using a scoping review to identify attributes, antecedents, consequences, surrogate terms, and related concepts associated with the "second victim" concept. Results: The attributes of the "second victim" concept involve persistent physical, emotional, and psychological consequences. Antecedents include a punitive culture and a lack of institutional and peer support. Consequences include sleep disorders, anger, fear, sadness, shame, intrusive memories, anxiety, depression, isolation, absenteeism, and leaving the profession. Related terms include patient safety and mental health, while surrogate terms include the "second victim phenomenon" and "second victim syndrome". Discussion: Punitive environments exacerbate negative impacts, undermine patient safety, promote error concealment, and increase underreporting, thereby hindering organizational learning and the correction of failures. Conclusion: The "second victim" concept refers to healthcare workers, scholars, and administrative or support staff who are directly or indirectly involved in patient care and who, when involved in an unintentional healthcare-related incident, manifest physical, emotional, and psychological reactions with repercussions across biopsychosocial, ethical, and legal dimensions. Without adequate and timely support, these reactions can become chronic and, eventually, pathological.

Indexed as

Concept FormationOccupational HealthPatient Safety

Identifiers

PMID42542892
PMCPMC13428665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.