Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542889›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Makeen Document Control System: Development, Standards-Based Validation, and Early Multisite Implementation of a Saudi-Built Laboratory Document Control Platform.

Kaneez Zamir, Abdulaziz Johani, Omar Qassas, Abdulrahman Aboud, Bilal Waheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaneez ZamirQuality and Accreditation Department, Saud Abdulaziz Al Shalan Company, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulaziz JohaniQuality and Accreditation Department, Saud Abdulaziz Al Shalan Company, Riyadh, SAU.
Omar QassasQuality and Accreditation Department, Saud Abdulaziz Al Shalan Company, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulrahman AboudQuality and Accreditation Department, Saud Abdulaziz Al Shalan Company, Riyadh, SAU.
Bilal WaheedInformation Technology Department, Saud Abdulaziz Al Shalan Company, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Document control is a core requirement of laboratory quality management and accreditation, including under the College of American Pathologists (CAP), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 17025, ISO 15189, the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB), and the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI). Before 2024, many Saudi laboratories relied on paper-based systems or imported platforms that lacked Arabic-language functionality, local hosting, and explicit alignment with Saudi regulatory and governance requirements. Objective To describe the development, standards-based internal validation, and early multisite implementation of the Makeen Document Control System (Makeen DCS), a Saudi-built laboratory document control platform designed for accreditation-oriented use in Saudi Arabia, and to assess early feasibility and user-perceived acceptability rather than comparative effectiveness. Methods This descriptive implementation and feasibility study was conducted from October 2024 to January 2026. System requirements were derived from CAP, ISO 17025, ISO 15189:2022, AABB, CBAHI, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, and Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) requirements and translated into software specifications. Development followed staged requirements definition, prototyping, workflow refinement, internal validation, and pilot deployment. Internal validation used 126 structured test cases across user access, document creation and upload, approval workflow, version control, retrieval, audit trail behavior, and administrative functions. Early implementation was undertaken in seven purposively selected pioneer laboratory sites. User feedback was collected through an internally developed implementation survey completed by eight participants from pilot sites. Results The Makeen DCS provided end-to-end document lifecycle management, role-based access control, bilingual Arabic-English interfaces, dynamic master document lists, searchable retrieval, audit-oriented reporting, and a personnel-documentation module. The system supported both Saudi-hosted cloud deployment and on-premises implementation. Functional alignment was mapped against selected CAP, ISO 17025, ISO 15189:2022, CBAHI, AABB, FDA Part 11, and PDPL requirements. Among 126 validation test cases, 109/126 (86.5%) passed on first execution, and 17/126 (13.5%) failed initially; all failed items were corrected and retested, resulting in a final pass rate of 100% (126/126). Early deployment was achieved across seven diverse sites, of which six were fully active, and one remained partially implemented by study cut-off. Median active users across sites were 80 (range: 30-200), median configured departments were 10 (range: 5-15), and median migrated or newly created controlled documents were 76 (range: 10-274) across six sites with available data. User feedback was favorable, with a mean satisfaction score of 9/10, 7/8 (87.5%) respondents willing to recommend the platform, and 8/8 (100.0%) perceiving improved inspection readiness and reduced manual or paper-based workload. Conclusions Makeen DCS was feasible as a Saudi-built/bilingual/locally hosted lab platform for accreditation workflows. Internal validation, pilot use, and small-sample feedback show readiness/acceptability, not operational effectiveness; independent longitudinal evaluation is needed.

Indexed as

aabbcapcloud computingdigital transformationdocument control systemiso 15189iso 17025laboratory accreditationquality of life programsaudi arabia 2030 vision

Identifiers

PMID42542889
PMCPMC13428454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.