Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542885›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Delayed Presentation of a Retained Knife Fragment Following Penetrating Abdominal Trauma and Exploratory Laparotomy.

Joseph R Ragan, Alyssa Sinko, Katherine Selman

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph R RaganEmergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Alyssa SinkoEmergency Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
Katherine SelmanEmergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report describes a rare delayed presentation of a retained knife fragment following penetrating abdominal trauma and prior exploratory laparotomy. A 23-year-old male patient presented seven months after sustaining a stab wound with progressive left lower abdominal, buttock, and radicular leg pain, along with new-onset testicular discomfort. His initial injury required emergent laparotomy for multiple small bowel and mesenteric injuries. Despite an initially uncomplicated postoperative course, persistent and worsening symptoms prompted reevaluation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 10-cm retained knife fragment within the left gluteal musculature extending toward the ischium. The patient underwent operative removal of the blade under fluoroscopic guidance, with a small distal fragment left embedded in bone. He recovered well and was discharged the following day. Retained foreign bodies after penetrating trauma are uncommon but clinically significant, with potential for delayed complications including pain, infection, and organ dysfunction. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in patients with persistent or unexplained symptoms after trauma, even months following initial management. Imaging, particularly CT, plays a critical role in identifying and localizing retained objects to guide safe surgical intervention. Additionally, this case highlights the need for meticulous intraoperative exploration and consideration of postoperative imaging in select high-risk patients to prevent missed foreign bodies and associated morbidity.

Indexed as

computed tomography (ct)emergency medicineexploratory laparotomygluteal foreign bodypelvic traumapenetrating abdominal traumaretained foreign bodyretained knife fragmenttrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID42542885
PMCPMC13428628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.