Observational studyPeerJ2026
Perceptions about protein supplements among adults in Saudi Arabia (knowledge and attitude, use, health beliefs, and safety concerns).
Observational study in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Protein supplements have gained popularity among gym users in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to collect data from adults in Saudi Arabia focusing on six components related to protein supplements: demographic characteristics of participants, health and physical activity information, knowledge and attitudes, use, health beliefs, and safety concerns. Method: This study was a cross-sectional, observational online survey targeting adults in Saudi Arabia. Participants included males and females aged 18 and older. Participants who did not complete the survey, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women, were excluded. Ethical approval was obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research at Qassim University. Data were analyzed by gender using SPSS version 25, with descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. A total of 358 participants completed the online questionnaire, while two participants did not complete it between March 29, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Result: Regarding knowledge and attitudes, about 68.2% of participants (including both users and non-users of protein supplements) were aware of protein supplements, with males (81.3%) showing significantly higher awareness than females (63.7%). Additionally, 64.8% of participants (both male and female) were unaware of the risks associated with protein supplements. Of all participants, 56% of males and 39.3% of females did not believe that natural protein sources are enough for muscle building, indicating a significant difference. About 127 participants (35.5%) reported using protein supplements either currently or in the past, with no significant difference between males and females. Of those who reported using protein supplements, 11.8% experienced some side effects and were significantly less knowledgeable about the amount of protein they should consume from food and how much protein is enough for their needs. The majority of protein supplement users (48.8%) did not know if protein powders could contain doping agents, with females reporting significantly higher responses than males. Regarding safety concerns, only 43.3% of protein supplement users looked for protein supplements marked with NSF Certified for Sport Conclusions: There remains a significant need for increased education about the proper use of protein supplements to minimize potential side effects and increase understanding of their health risks and safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.