ReviewFrontiers in dentistry2026
Bonding to Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization Affected Teeth: A Scoping Review of Adhesive Strategies, In Vitro Performance, and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molarincisor hypomineralization (MIH) poses major restorative challenges due to compromised enamel and its reduced bonding capacity. This scoping review evaluated treatment options for MIHaffected young permanent teeth following PRISMAScR guidelines. A systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct and gray literature identified 21 eligible studies published between 2013 and 2025, including invitro and clinical studies. Laboratory findings demonstrated lower bond strengths in MIH enamel compared with the sound enamel. Etchandrinse adhesives performed more reliably than that of selfetch systems, while pretreatment procedures improved adhesion in some settings. Clinical studies showed resinbased sealants and composites bonded with etchandrinse adhesives achieved higher retention. Glass ionomer and glass hybrid restorations offered mostly short-term success and are best used as an interim option. Investigated indirect restorations provided superior longevity in severe cases. Preventive adjuncts such as applying varnishes reduced hypersensitivity and caries risk. Finally, this review highlights the central role of adhesive performance in MIH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.