ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Assessment of Color Stability and Translucency of Five High-Translucent Resin Composites.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate and compare the color stability and translucency of high-translucent resin composites after exposure to distilled water and coffee. Materials and Methods: Standardized disc-shaped specimens of five commercially available translucent resin composites (n = 60; 12 specimens per group) were fabricated and evaluated at three time points: baseline (T0), after 30 days in distilled water (T1), and after an additional 30 days in coffee (T2). Color was measured using a spectrophotometer and expressed as E00, while translucency was assessed using the translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results: All materials showed a significant increase in color change after coffee exposure (p < 0.05). Beautifil II exhibited the highest discoloration at T2-T0 (17.76 [2.18]), followed by Forma Trans (14.93 [3.70]), whereas Opallis T Neutral showed the lowest values (8.31 [2.84]). At T1-T0, Opallis T Neutral also presented the lowest color change (1.42 [0.67]). Regarding translucency, Filtek Z350 XT Trans showed the highest TP values at T2 (15.38 [2.74]), while several materials, particularly Beautifil II (-4.08 [4.35]) and PALFIQUE LX5 (-4.60 [2.96]), exhibited reductions in TP after coffee immersion. Opallis T Neutral showed minimal variation in translucency (-0.19 [1.19]). Conclusions: High-translucent resin composites showed significant differences in optical stability. Coffee exposure increased discoloration and reduced translucency in most materials. Opallis T Neutral demonstrated the best overall performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.