ArticleFrontiers in dentistry2026
Relationship between Voxel Value of Cone Beam CT and Hounsfield Unit of CT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to investigate the relationship between voxel value obtained from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in studies compared to Hounsfield of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. A literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science searching for relevant literature until February 2022 (updated at July 2023). A risk of bias assessment of the studies was performed using a modified checklist based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. The software version 20.104 of MedCalc was used to conduct the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Out of 4750 articles in the initial search, 13 met the eligibility criteria. Out of the articles, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Both heterogeneous and homogenous samples showed a strong correlation between the voxel value of CBCT and Hounsfield Unit (HU), with high heterogeneity (r=0.900 and 0.998 respectively and I2>70%). Two other meta-analyses were conducted for kVp and voxel size, which showed a high correlation. The 95% confidence interval was used to present the estimated pooled correlation. The strong correlation of voxel value and HU indicates the possible potential of CBCT in radiographic bone density measurement. However, further research is needed to obtain an accurate conversion equation for translating voxel values of CBCT to HU. Calibration of voxel values within each scan using a reference object and consideration of both linear and non-linear regression could improve accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.