ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Interobserver Agreement for Classifying Infections in Emergency Department Patients Using Modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Criteria.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and evaluate a standardized emergency department (ED) adapted framework based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) surveillance definitions and modified SOFA assessment for reproducible infection and sepsis classification in patients with suspected infection on the ED. Methods: As part of the prospective cohort study BIOSEP, adults presenting to the ED with suspected infection and a Modified Early Warning Score ≥2 were consecutively enrolled between 2022 and 2026 at 4 Dutch hospitals. All enrolled patients in this study were retrospectively adjudicated through post hoc review of their electronic health records. Each case was independently assessed by 2 blinded physicians for plausibility of infection, infection diagnosis, causative pathogen, and sepsis occurrence. Disagreements were resolved by a third blinded reviewer. Interobserver agreement was quantified using Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement coefficients (gAC). Results: In total, 1062 ED patients were included with 1145 infection episodes. Interobserver agreement for infection diagnosis was 88.9%, and agreement statistics were classified as very good with Cohen's κ of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89) and a gAC1 of 0.89 (0.87-0.91). Agreement for causative pathogens was 90.1% (κ 0.89 [0.87-0.92]; gAC1 0.97 [0.95-0.98]), and for sepsis occurrence 93.4% (κ 0.80 [0.76-0.85]; gAC1 0.92 [0.90-0.94]). Agreement for plausibility of infection was also high (87.9%; weighted κ 0.87 [0.85-0.89]; gAC2 0.92 [0.90-0.93]). Conclusions: Our ED-adapted adjudication framework based on CDC surveillance definitions yields high interobserver agreement for infection and sepsis classification across a heterogeneous ED population, supporting its use in large-scale observational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.