Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542768›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health insights2026

Seasonal and Spatial Dynamics of Tick Infestation in Domestic Animals of Wayanad Forest Region, Southern India: A Longitudinal Survey.

Mannarakkal Thazham Swathy Viswanath, Rouchelle Charmaine Tellis, Sohanlal Thiruvoth, Vipin Viswanath, Koyyan Prakasan, Mannarakkal Thazham Sneha Viswanath, Manathottathil Aiswarya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mannarakkal Thazham Swathy ViswanathDepartment of Microbiology, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4557-9430
Rouchelle Charmaine TellisDepartment of Microbiology, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2516-3765
Sohanlal ThiruvothHead Infection Control, Kuwait Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
Vipin ViswanathDepartment of Molecular Biology and Transplant Immunology, Aster MIMS Hospital, Calicut, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-8764
Koyyan PrakasanPostgraduate & Research Department of Zoology, Maharaja's College (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala), Ernakulam, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0637-114X
Mannarakkal Thazham Sneha ViswanathDepartment of Microbiology, MIMS College of Allied Health Sciences, Aster MIMS Academy, Malappuram, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5244-0013
Manathottathil AiswaryaPostgraduate & Research Department of Zoology, Maharaja's College (Affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala), Ernakulam, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5737-1510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and background: Ticks are hematophagous ectoparasites of veterinary and public health relevance. This study examines the seasonal distribution, host-specific burden, and species composition of ticks infesting domestic animals in the Wayanad district of Kerala, India. Methods: A longitudinal field survey was conducted from 2022 to 2024 across 40 locations in 3 ecological zones of Wayanad. Ticks were manually collected from domestic animals; cattle, goats, dogs, and cats during 3 seasons: monsoon, winter, and summer. Collected ticks were morphologically identified to the species level. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and Kruskal-Wallis Results: A total of 2562 ticks were collected. Tick abundance was highest during the monsoon (1231; 48.06%), followed by winter (965; 37.66%) and summer (366; 14.28%). Cattle accounted for the highest tick load (n = 1529; 59.7%), followed by goats (592; 23.1%), dogs (313; 12.2%), and cats (128; 5.0%). Mean tick burden per animal was highest in Zone 1 (12.79 ± 6.01), and lowest in Zone 3 (10.20 ± 5.37). Seasonally, winter showed the highest mean burden (4.91 ± 3.63). Seven tick species from 3 genera were identified, with Conclusion: The presence of zoonotic tick vectors across hosts, seasons, and zones indicates high epidemiological risk the need for integrated ecological surveillance and region-specific tick control strategies.

Indexed as

haemaphysalis bispinosamean tick burdentick infestationvector surveillanceveterinary entomology

Identifiers

PMID42542768
PMCPMC13428112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.