ArticleHealth equity
From Detroit to Kansas City: Adapting the WE CARE Model to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.
Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The United States lags peer nations in infant mortality, with persistent racial and geographic inequities. In Missouri, Black infants experience mortality rates more than double those of White infants. Addressing these disparities requires community-driven interventions beginning before conception and extending beyond routine perinatal care. Objectives: We describe the development and feasibility of Women & Person-Empowered Community Access for Reproductive Equity (WE CARE)-Jackson County (JC), a reproductive justice-informed intervention adapted from the Detroit WE CARE model to address reproductive health and infant mortality disparities. Design/Setting: WE CARE-JC used a two-phase, mixed-methods design. Phase 1 included listening sessions with advocacy groups and reproductive-age women, and a community survey ( Results: Listening sessions identified trusted providers as preferred sources of family planning guidance, while stigma, limited provider access, and knowledge gaps were key barriers. Survey data showed social (13% housing, 22% food, and 35% transportation insecurity) and medical (51% comorbid condition) vulnerability. In the pilot, 45 women were enrolled (85% of those approached), of whom 58% scheduled follow-up care and 10 (39%) attended appointments. Feedback from eight attendees showed high acceptability of the MyPath tool, counseling, and navigation support. Implications for Health Equity: WE CARE-JC demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of a reproductive justice-informed, community-engaged model to reduce barriers and improve equitable access to reproductive health care. This model provides a scalable framework for addressing upstream drivers of infant mortality inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.