ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
The Use of Self-MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) for Nutritional Status Measurement of Elderly Females in a Community-based Health Care.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the use of Indonesian Self-MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) as a modest and simple tool to screen the risk of malnutrition in the elderly in the community-based care setting. Methods: This formative study involved 20 females, aged 60 and above, who were chosen from a local community health post-elderly program in Depok-West Java, Indonesia. Self-MNA was administered by a health cadre and compared to Full MNA administered by a trained nutritionist as the gold standard. Results: All respondents were female, the mean age was 65.35 years (SD = 4.71), the mean BMI was 24.34 (SD = 2.87), and the mean, median, and mode of the Self-MNA score were 11.6, 12, and 13, respectively. While for the Full MNA, the mean, median, and mode score were 25.35, 25.50, and 22.50, respectively. The sensitivity of Self-MNA compared to Full MNA was 100%, while the specificity was 78.9%. Linear regression test between Self-MNA and MNA showed the r value was 0.675 showing a moderate correlation between Self-MNA and full MNA. The total Healthy Eating Index (HEI) of the respondents was 62.25 or included in the category that needed improvement. Conclusion: Self-MNA is a simple tool that can be administered independently by health cadre or family members, and has shown high level of inter tools reliability and validity compared to the full MNA as a standard. Thus, further development of app-based Self-MNA for elderly nutritional status monitoring maybe feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.