ArticleiScience2026
Semantic knowledge improves molecular machine learning for chemical toxicity prediction.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling predicts chemical activity from structural and physico-chemical molecular properties. Beyond molecular structure, a growing body of semantic knowledge-often represented as knowledge graphs, in which biomedical entities are linked by interpretable relations reflecting scientific evidence-can inform computational toxicology. Here, we assess adding semantic knowledge to graph neural network (GNN)-based QSAR modeling to improve assay- and endpoint-level toxicity prediction, formulated as binary classification of active/inactive compounds. Both approaches we investigate use GNNs to learn molecular representations and augment them with semantic knowledge. Across publicly available in silico toxicity datasets, including Tox21 assays and external endpoints, semantic models improve discrimination while maintaining calibration comparable to structure-only QSAR models. Model explanations show that semantic knowledge helps the GNN encoder focus on substructures with known toxicity effects. Integrating mechanistic semantic context with molecular structure offers a route to more accurate and interpretable toxicity models that support chemical safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.