ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026
Automatic prediction of patients early discontinuation in oncology clinical trials.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early discontinuation (ED) in clinical trials (CTs) is frequent and deleterious for the patients, the care team, and the study duration. ED comprises screening failure or discontinuation during the first month of the treatment phase, and is often difficult to predict by clinicians. We aim at predicting ED by automatic analysis of patient's clinical record using language models (LMs). Materials and methods: We fine-tuned a French LM on the oncology clinical reports of a French cancer center, and obtained a pretrained LM named OncoBERT. We then selected consultation reports of patients included in oncology CTs for any tumor type that we used to fine-tune OncoBERT and obtained a new model for ED prediction. We carried out a retrospective and prospective evaluation and used eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to interpret the predictions. Results: On the retrospective test cohort of 1007 reports, the model achieved a precision of 0.77, recall of 0.95, and could have decreased the ED rate from 25.3% to 21.3%. On the prospective test cohort it reached a precision of 0.75, recall of 0.75, and could have decreased the ED rate from 33.7% to 27%. Using XAI showed that the words used by the model to predict ED reflect deterioration of general condition, a well-known factor of ED. Conclusion: We have developed a LM that is portable, explainable, with near-human performances for ED prediction in oncology CTs. We anticipate that democratization of automatic trial matching tools should be complemented by ED prediction tools to fully optimize access to CTs and patient recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.