Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542664›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

Refining sequence-to-activity models by increasing model resolution.

Nuria Alina Chandra, Yan Hu, Jason D Buenrostro, Sara Mostafavi, Alexander Sasse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nuria Alina ChandraPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0827-8924
Yan HuGene Regulation Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.
Jason D BuenrostroGene Regulation Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.
Sara MostafaviPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4698-1177
Alexander SassePaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-8848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoding the cis-regulatory syntax that controls gene expression is essential for improving our understanding of cell differentiation and disease. Deep learning based sequence-to-activity (S2A) models learn to identify regulatory motifs and their syntax through modeling chromatin accessibility. Previously, we developed AI-TAC, a S2A model that predicts chromatin accessibility across various immune cell types in multi-task fashion, effectively decoding the regulatory syntax underlying immune cell differentiation. While ATAC-seq is commonly used to measure regional accessibility, it also provides high-resolution profiles, the distribution of Tn5 insertion sites, that offer additional insights into the precise location and strength of TF binding sites. Here we present bpAI-TAC, a base-pair resolution ATAC-seq model, and demonstrate that modeling ATAC-seq profiles alongside accessibility consistently improves predictions of differential chromatin accessibility across cell types. Moreover, we find that multi-task learning across related immune cell types consistently outperforms single-task models. To understand what additional information bpAI-TAC learns from ATAC-seq profiles, we systematically compare sequence attributions from models trained with and without ATAC-seq profiles. We identify novel motifs with strong effect sizes that emerge when profile data is included. Our findings suggest that modeling ATAC-seq at base-pair resolution enables the model to learn a more nuanced and sensitive representation of the cis-regulatory syntax driving immune cell-specific chromatin landscapes.

Identifiers

PMID42542664
PMCPMC13427759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.