ArticlePEC innovation2026
Implementation of a clinical trial communication skills training workshop for oncology fellows: A mixed methods evaluation.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) are essential to advancing treatment, yet enrollment remains low. An oncologist's recommendation influences participation, but many eligible patients are never offered the option, and discussions often lack clarity or equity. CCT communication skills training can improve oncologists' confidence and patient-centered communication behaviors, yet most Hematology-Oncology fellowship programs lack structured curricula in this area. To address this gap, we implemented a CCT communication skills workshop (COMM-CCT) for Hematology-Oncology fellows. Methods: We implemented the COMM-CCT workshop at seven Hem-Onc fellowship programs in 2024. The three-hour, synchronous web-based workshop included a one-hour didactic session followed by two hours of small-group role play with cancer survivors acting as patients. We evaluated reach, acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity using post-course surveys and semi-structured interviews. Results: Across seven sites, 72% ( Conclusions: The COMM-CCT workshop is acceptable and feasible to implement in Hem-Onc fellowship programs. Findings will inform its refinement, broader scaling, and continued integration into graduate medical education programs. Innovation: This study's innovation is in its integration of a nationwide communication-focused intervention on clinical trials into existing training structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.