Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542618›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

AI-driven and advanced sensing technologies for subsurface oil exploration.

Alhamrah Mohannad Firas Ali, Alzharawi Shamil Kamil Khanjar, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Azeev, Paschal Chimeremeze Chiadighikaobi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alhamrah Mohannad Firas AliDepartment of Subsoil Use and Oil and Gas Engineering, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia.
Alzharawi Shamil Kamil KhanjarDepartment of Subsoil Use and Oil and Gas Engineering, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia.
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich AzeevDepartment of Subsoil Use and Oil and Gas Engineering, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia.
Paschal Chimeremeze ChiadighikaobiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subsurface oil exploration is becoming increasingly challenging due to the complexity of geological formations, growing exploration depths, and the limitations of conventional interpretation methods. A thorough analysis of current developments in artificial intelligence and sophisticated sensing technologies for subsurface oil prospecting is presented. With special emphasis on their uses, advantages, and implementation difficulties, this paper assesses advancements in seismic imaging, electromagnetic surveys, remote sensing, machine learning, and integrated data interpretation frameworks. The results show that while advanced sensing technologies offer higher-resolution subsurface information and lower exploration uncertainty, artificial intelligence greatly increases exploration efficiency by enhancing data processing, pattern recognition, reservoir characterization, and decision-making. Nonetheless, there are lots of issues with data quality, model dependability, scalability, and field deployment. The review offers a thorough reference for researchers and industry practitioners looking to increase exploration accuracy, efficiency, and sustainability. It also emphasizes future research possibilities for intelligent, integrated exploration systems.

Indexed as

deep drillingenergy sustainabilityoil explorationsubsoiltechnologies in exploration

Identifiers

PMID42542618
PMCPMC13427567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.