ArticleDialogues in health2026
Rapid cross-sectional impact assessment of an earthquake on the continuity of antenatal care for pregnant women living with hepatitis B in Vanuatu.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Natural disasters such as earthquakes, cyclones, and volcanic eruptions directly and indirectly impact health and wellbeing. This work aimed to understand how access to, and use of, peripartum health services were impacted following a large 7.3 magnitude earthquake in Vanuatu in the context of an ongoing field trial looking at the effectiveness of universal peripartum antiviral prophylaxis for pregnant women living with hepatitis B to prevent mother-to-child transmission. Methods: Participants were pregnant women enrolled in the intervention-arm of a field trial at sites in the earthquake-affected area. During routine monitoring calls, we asked additional questions about the impact of the earthquake on continued access to health services and continued use of daily hepatitis B antiviral prophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Results: Seventeen participants of 26 women enrolled in the trial could be contacted and answered all questions from early-February to early-March 2025. Self-reported continued use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was high, with only two of 17 participants reporting interruptions to use in the weeks following the earthquake. Seven participants (41%) reported missing at least one routine antenatal or postnatal appointment in the three months following the earthquake. Conclusions: In natural disaster-prone settings, it is critical that field research take an adaptive approach that can adjust and respond to health emergencies. While natural disasters are inevitable, health systems must implement risk mitigation strategies to limit interruptions to routine health services to reduce negative short-, medium-, and long-term health impacts of natural disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.