Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542583›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Automated cardiac arrest detection using wrist-derived photoplethysmography during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a prospective clinical validation study.

Roos Edgar, Catharina E Jansen, Lente R Pol, Kambiz Ebrahimkheil, Ruud C van Kaam, Eelko Ronner, Marc A Brouwer, Rypko J Beukema, Aysun Cetinyurek-Yavuz, Peter C Stas and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roos EdgarDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Catharina E JansenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lente R PolDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Kambiz EbrahimkheilCorsano Health, Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 35, 2595 AN, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Ruud C van KaamIntensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eelko RonnerDepartment of Cardiology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD, Delft, the Netherlands.
Marc A BrouwerDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rypko J BeukemaDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Aysun Cetinyurek-YavuzRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter C StasCorsano Health, Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 35, 2595 AN, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Eric BoersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelia W E HoedemaekersIntensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Judith L BonnesDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Automated cardiac arrest detection and alerting using wearable technology has the potential to shorten recognition delays for unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In DETECT-1A and -1B, a photoplethysmography-based detection model was developed and validated in patients with induced cardiac arrest. This study evaluates model performance in true cardiac arrests following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Methods: Prospective, single-center study in adult ICU patients with planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Patients wore a photoplethysmography-wristband (CardioWatch) until death. Continuous ECG and invasive arterial pressure served as reference standards. The previously developed rule-based algorithm was refined using two training cohorts and evaluated in a separate test cohort. Endpoints were sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection and false positive alerts. Findings: Forty-four patients were included (training 1: n = 10; training 2: n = 11; test: n = 23), median age 65 years; 75% male, all with non-shockable cardiac arrest. Sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection was 100% (10/10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 66-100%) and 90% (9/10; 95% CI 54-99%), in training 1 and 2, respectively. In the test set, sensitivity was 100% (23/23; 95% CI 82-100%), with one false positive alert. Cardiac arrest was detected at a mean arterial pressure of 30 mmHg (IQR 24-35) and pulse pressure of 13 mmHg (IQR 11-19). Interpretation: Cardiac arrest can be detected with high sensitivity using wrist-derived photoplethysmography, providing first evidence on model performance in true cardiac arrest, specifically in non-shockable cases. Findings support further development of wearable-based cardiac arrest detection technologies to enable earlier recognition for unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Funding: Dutch Heart Foundation, Radboudumc.

Indexed as

Automated detectionNon-shockable cardiac arrestOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPhotoplethysmographyWearable

Identifiers

PMID42542583
PMCPMC13427576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.