ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Automated cardiac arrest detection using wrist-derived photoplethysmography during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a prospective clinical validation study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automated cardiac arrest detection and alerting using wearable technology has the potential to shorten recognition delays for unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In DETECT-1A and -1B, a photoplethysmography-based detection model was developed and validated in patients with induced cardiac arrest. This study evaluates model performance in true cardiac arrests following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Methods: Prospective, single-center study in adult ICU patients with planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Patients wore a photoplethysmography-wristband (CardioWatch) until death. Continuous ECG and invasive arterial pressure served as reference standards. The previously developed rule-based algorithm was refined using two training cohorts and evaluated in a separate test cohort. Endpoints were sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection and false positive alerts. Findings: Forty-four patients were included (training 1: n = 10; training 2: n = 11; test: n = 23), median age 65 years; 75% male, all with non-shockable cardiac arrest. Sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection was 100% (10/10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 66-100%) and 90% (9/10; 95% CI 54-99%), in training 1 and 2, respectively. In the test set, sensitivity was 100% (23/23; 95% CI 82-100%), with one false positive alert. Cardiac arrest was detected at a mean arterial pressure of 30 mmHg (IQR 24-35) and pulse pressure of 13 mmHg (IQR 11-19). Interpretation: Cardiac arrest can be detected with high sensitivity using wrist-derived photoplethysmography, providing first evidence on model performance in true cardiac arrest, specifically in non-shockable cases. Findings support further development of wearable-based cardiac arrest detection technologies to enable earlier recognition for unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Funding: Dutch Heart Foundation, Radboudumc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.