ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Perforating scleral vessel angular metrics as a structural biomarker of myopic choroidal neovascularisation.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo quantitatively assess the entrance angle variability and location of perforating scleral vessels (PSVs) in highly myopic eyes and to investigate its association with myopic choroidal neovascularisation (mCNV) versus lacquer cracks (LC).
methodsEntrance angles from the sclera to choroid were measured on each B-scan OCT using ImageJ and associated angle metrics were calculated per PSVs. Additional variables included subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and vessel-to-fovea distance (VFD). In mCNV eyes the total number of injections and treatment duration were also accounted.
resultsA total of 42 eyes were included, 25 with mCNV and 17 with LC. Eyes with mCNV demonstrated significantly greater PSV angular variability including angular standard deviation, and their normalised metrics compared to LC eyes (all p < 0.001). VFD was shorter in the mCNV group (50.2 ± 52.6 µm vs. 91.5 ± 39.6 µm, p = 0.006). Normalised angle metrics correlated positively with the total number of anti-VEGF injections (r ≈ 0.37, p < 0.05), whereas no association was observed with treatment duration. In multivariable regression, no predictors reached statistical significance although normalised angle range (NAR) showed a trend toward a negative association with VFD (p = 0.060).
conclusionsPSV angular variability was markedly greater in mCNV eyes and correlated with anti-VEGF injection burden reflecting higher treatment intensity but not longer disease duration. These findings suggest that PSV geometry influences LC and mCNV, may serve as an imaging biomarker of disease activity in mCNV. Shorter VFD and greater angular dispersion likely reflect structural and hemodynamic alterations predisposing to mCNV.
Identifiers
42542506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.