SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Peroneus longus autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed procedure aimed at restoring knee stability and function following ligament injury. Although hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used, concerns regarding donor-site morbidity and graft-related limitations persist. The peroneus longus tendon (PLT) has recently gained attention as an alternative autograft, offering favourable biomechanical properties and potentially reduced morbidity. However, evidence comparing clinical outcomes between PLT and HT autografts remains limited and inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of PLT versus HT autografts in primary ACLR using high-level evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing PLT and HT autografts in primary ACLR was conducted. Databases were searched up to December 2025. Outcomes included patient-reported scores, knee stability, graft characteristics, donor-site morbidity, and ankle function.
resultsFour RCTs involving 407 patients were included. Lysholm and IKDC scores were comparable between groups. The PLT group demonstrated significantly better modified Cincinnati scores (MD, 3.02; P = 0.0004) and larger graft diameter. Donor-site morbidity was significantly lower with PLT (OR 0.12; P = 0.007). Knee stability and graft failure rates were similar. AOFAS scores showed no significant postoperative decline.
conclusionPLT autografts provide outcomes comparable to HT with potential advantages in donor-site morbidity and graft characteristics, supporting their use as a reliable alternative in ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42542493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.