ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Immediate urinary continence after continence-preserving holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center comparative cohort study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- At catheter removal or after surgery? Interpreting immediate continence after HoLEP and TUPKP.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare immediate postoperative urinary continence and short-term functional outcomes between continence-preserving holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 212 consecutive men who underwent continence-preserving transurethral surgery for BPH at a single center between October 2024 and November 2025. Patients were grouped according to the procedure actually received (HoLEP, n = 109; TUPKP, n = 103). The primary endpoint was immediate continence after catheter removal, defined as < 1 g leakage on a standardized 1-h pad test. Pad weight was analyzed with non-parametric testing because of skewness. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score sensitivity analyses were used to adjust the comparison of immediate continence.
resultsBaseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups. Immediate continence was achieved in 74/109 patients after HoLEP and 33/103 patients after TUPKP (67.89% vs. 32.04%, P < 0.001). The association remained significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.99, 95% CI 4.56-21.86, P < 0.001) and in a propensity-score weighted sensitivity model (OR 5.06, 95% CI 2.82-9.06, P < 0.001). Median 1-h pad weight was lower after HoLEP (0.74 g [IQR 0.51-1.49]) than after TUPKP (3.58 g [IQR 0.88-6.79], P < 0.001). At 1 month, HoLEP was associated with lower IPSS and better QoL, while Qmax was similar between groups. Bladder irrigation time, catheterization time, and postoperative hospital stay were shorter after HoLEP. A significant procedure-by-prostate-volume interaction suggested that the association between gland size and early leakage was weaker after HoLEP than after TUPKP.
conclusionContinence-preserving HoLEP was associated with higher immediate urinary continence and faster early postoperative recovery than continence-preserving TUPKP, while achieving similar short-term flow improvement. These findings should be interpreted as early functional outcomes from a single-center retrospective cohort; longer prospective follow-up is needed to confirm durable continence and complication profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42542474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.