ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence-based photographic detection of pink esthetic score attributes using a hybrid deep learning segmentation pipeline: a method development study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and internally validate a novel anatomy-driven artificial intelligence (AI) system for automated postoperative Pink Esthetic Score (PES) evaluation from intraoral photographs. Unlike most existing AI approaches, which rely on end-to-end prediction, the proposed pipeline derives PES attributes from anatomically grounded measurements. A hybrid analytical pipeline integrating instance segmentation and rule-based measurement was developed. Tooth crown segmentation was performed using Mask R-CNN, while gingival segmentation was performed using YOLOv11. Anatomical features were extracted from the segmented structures and converted into ordinal PES attributes through data-driven threshold calibration derived from the training dataset. The reference standard consisted of independent expert scoring of 82 postoperative intraoral photographs. Diagnostic accuracy, confusion matrix analyses, and regression metrics were calculated to evaluate agreement between automated and expert assessments. The hybrid segmentation-based system achieved accuracies of 91.5% for the mesial papilla, 85.4% for the distal papilla, 86.6% for the gingival margin, and 82.9% for gingival color assessment. Exact agreement between automated and expert total PES scores was observed in 57.3% of cases, increasing to 79.3% when a clinically relevant tolerance of ± 1 PES point was applied. Regression analysis demonstrated a mean absolute error of 0.76, a root mean squared error of 1.35, and an R² value of 0.49. An anatomy-driven segmentation framework may provide a transparent and reproducible approach for automated photographic PES attribute assessment in research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.