SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2026
Ozonated water as a preventive oral hygiene aid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its role in reducing dental plaque.
Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOzonated water is increasingly being explored as a gentler alternative to chlorhexidine for chemical plaque control because of its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties and the absence of common side effects such as staining or altered taste. However, the evidence on its effectiveness-especially in healthy individuals-remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether ozonated water is more effective than placebo or chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing dental plaque.
methodsAn extensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar up to August 5, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving healthy participants and comparing ozonated water with placebo or chlorhexidine were included. In total, five studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, of which four were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsThe meta-analysis suggested that ozonated water may provide slightly better short-term plaque reduction than placebo or chlorhexidine (SMD = -1.35; 95% CI: -2.77 to 0.06). However, as the confidence interval crossed the line of no effect, this difference was not statistically significant. Risk of bias was high in one study, unclear in three studies, and low in one study. The overall certainty for plaque reduction was rated as "low".
conclusionWhile ozonated water appears to be a promising short-term option for plaque control-especially for individuals unable to tolerate chlorhexidine-the current evidence is not strong enough to confirm that it works better than standard rinses or even plain water. Well-designed, longer-term clinical trials are needed before ozonated water can be recommended for routine daily use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42542467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.