ArticleScientific data2026
Curating and sharing XAS data - Metadata and Scientific quality control.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the growing volume of measured X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) data and their need for machine-learning and reference purposes across different facilities, both spectral quality and documentation of the XAS measurements need to be standardized. The documentation is also important to avoid unnecessarily repeating reference measurements and therefore wasting precious beamtime. In this article, we have discussed the classification of quality control with respect to meta data and scientific quality, important for standard documentation and curation of the XAS data. As an example, we take the use case of the RefXAS database developed under the DAPHNE4NFDI project. Considering that the database is under development, the initial requirement for an XAS database is a comprehensive set of metadata fields, that enhances the interpretation of XAS spectra; thereby improving its reusability and the reproducibility. The metadata schema should be able to provide details about the sample, optimized equipment and measurement conditions thereby making the process of acquiring the data clear. The next important component is the evaluation of the quality of the spectra as raw data and the metadata set to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data stored in the database. Quality criteria need to be formulated for automated initial screening of any uploaded data set followed by manual curation involving utilization of details of metadata provided during upload and scientific quality of the XAS data. In this way, metadata and scientific quality control for XAS data uploaded at a database will provide a well-defined protocol for curation of the data and strengthen its distribution under FAIR data principles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.