ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
Diagnostic Testing After Positive Cell-Free DNA Screening for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: Clinical and Socioeconomic Determinants.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess socioeconomic and medical factors associated with prenatal confirmatory diagnostic testing after positive prenatal cell-free (cfDNA) screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in a diverse contemporary patient cohort.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had abnormal prenatal cfDNA screening results indicative of SCA and were seen for genetic counseling between 2014 and 2024 at two tertiary academic medical centers. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association of demographic and clinical factors with confirmatory testing.
resultsOf the 692 patients with abnormal cfDNA results, 26% (n = 180) underwent diagnostic testing. These patients were older, resided in more affluent areas, presented earlier for genetic counseling, were more likely to have commercial insurance, and were less likely to prefer Spanish or use an interpreter. Compared to Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites, diagnostic testing rates were higher for NH Asians but were lower for NH Blacks and Hispanics or when results indicated XYY or XXX. In logistic modeling, lower deprivation scores and commercial insurance were independently associated with higher testing rates.
conclusionOnly 1 in 4 patients pursued prenatal diagnostic testing following positive cfDNA screening for SCAs. Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and preferred language were the primary determinants of testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.