ArticleDiabetes & metabolic syndrome2026
The relationships between figure rating scale, anthropometric measures, and cardiometabolic outcomes: the AADM study.
Article in Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDirect measurement of anthropometrics can be impractical in research. Validated Figure Rating Scales (FRS) offer an alternative, but their validity across populations remains limited.
objectivesThis study aimed to analyze the relationships between figure rating scale (FRS) and anthropometric measures (body mass index (BMI); waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)) and to specifically evaluate FRS at the time of enrollment and lifetime body size, an FRS-derived score as risk factors for cardiometabolic traits including type 2 diabetes (T2D).
methodsParticipants consisted of 650 adults from the America Africa Diabetes Mellitus study. Kendall's tau coefficient (τ) was used to analyze correlations between FRS at the time of enrollment, overall obesity, and abdominal obesity. Regression models were used to evaluate FRS at the time of enrollment and lifetime body size as risk factors for T2D, and related traits.
resultsBMI and WHR increased monotonically with increasing body size. FRS at the time of enrollment showed a stronger correlation with BMI (τ = 0.48, p < 0.0001) than with WHR (τ = 0.17, p < 0.0001) in women. Lifetime body size was significantly associated with T2D (OR = 1.044, 95% Confidence Limit: [1.006, 1.08]; both FRS at the time of enrollment and lifetime body size were associated with insulin resistance. Diastolic blood pressure was associated with FRS at the time of enrollment.
conclusionsFRS at the time of enrollment is significantly associated with BMI and WHR in this population and lifetime body size, a novel composite score, shows promising utility as a predictor of T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.