ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Emergency Care Needs in an Asymmetric Conflict: A Facility-Based Cohort Study From Israel on October 7, 2023.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to the deteriorating global security situation, many countries are preparing their health systems for armed conflict. Wartime health care delivery is challenging due to the loss of territorial control and attacks on Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The objectives of this study were to use Emergency Department (ED) data from the hospital closest to the areas of fighting during the October 7, 2023, attacks in Israel, to determine what patient factors relate to status as dead on arrival (DoA), high acuity, and to explore the epidemiology of injury patterns.
methodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study. All patients presenting with injuries from the October 7, 2023, attacks, from 06h30 until 24h00, were included. Variables included demographics, patient classification (civilian or combatant), mode of arrival, condition, injury mechanism and injury location. Two logistic regression models with backward elimination were used to determine the patient factors associated with DoA and high acuity.
resultsA total of 301 patients were included. A majority (67.8%) arrived at the ED informally instead of by ambulance (23.9%). A total of 26.6% were DoA. Informal arrival was associated with DoA (OR 10.73, CI [4.18-36.55]). Injuries by firearms and thoracic injuries had higher odds of high acuity (OR 4.15 95% CI [1.67-11.50] and OR 4.35 95% CI [1.49-12.95]), while extremity injuries had lower odds (OR 0.41 95% CI [0.17-0.99]). Firearm-related injuries were more common among combatants compared to civilians (55.3% vs. 35.1%, p ≤ 0.05). Extremity injuries accounted for more than half of injuries in both civilians and combatants (52.3% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.31).
conclusionIn an armed conflict with loss of territorial control and reduced EMS access, healthcare planners may need to anticipate significant prehospital death and that many patients arrive at hospital informally. Prehospital death may be reduced by expanding lay bystander skills in trauma care as these may access patients before ambulances do. Due to survival bias, patients with firearm-related injuries may have more urgent care needs upon reaching hospital than patients with explosion-related injuries. Given the higher survivability of extremity injuries, these may be overrepresented among patients who reach hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.