ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
A clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: Development and retrospective evaluation.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveChildren with congenital heart disease are highly vulnerable to drug-related adverse effects due to the use of complex polypharmacy. This study aimed to develop and retrospectively evaluate a hybrid clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in this population.MethodsThis two-phase study combined machine-learning techniques and expert clinical rules. Phase 1 included a retrospective analysis of 4651 pediatric congenital heart disease reports from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System to train and compare five machine-learning models. The best-performing model, Random Forest, was selected. In Phase 2, a hybrid clinical decision support system integrating the Random Forest model with an expert-validated rule-based engine was developed and retrospectively evaluated using 330 inpatient records of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.ResultsThe Random Forest model achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.902. During clinical validation, the hybrid clinical decision support system demonstrated a mean accuracy of 0.85 across 11 common drug-adverse effect pairs, outperforming standalone machine-learning- and rule-based approaches. This study demonstrated the feasibility and clinical fidelity of using a hybrid clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, supporting safer and more personalized pharmacotherapy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the feasibility and clinical fidelity of using a hybrid clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, supporting safer and more personalized pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.