ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) is an established and minimally invasive treatment option for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, its application in the postoperative setting after pancreatic resection has rarely been described. We report a case of extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy that was successfully managed using a step-up approach incorporating VARD. An 81-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail. On postoperative day (POD) 7, she developed sudden-onset abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated enlargement of the remnant pancreas with increased peripancreatic fat stranding. Follow-up CT on POD 9 and 12 revealed progressive enlargement of the fluid collection around the pancreatic stump with rapid extension of inflammatory changes into the retroperitoneal space. Conservative management with fasting and antibiotic therapy resulted in temporary improvement in inflammatory markers. However, extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis developed on POD 38. On POD 43, CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage failed to achieve adequate source control due to highly viscous necrotic debris, necessitating surgical necrosectomy. An additional drainage tube was placed to establish a retroperitoneal access route, after which VARD was performed on POD 55, with removal of 61 g of necrotic fatty tissue. Inflammatory markers rapidly improved, and the patient was discharged in good condition on POD 102. Infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was successfully managed using a step-up strategy incorporating VARD. This case highlights VARD as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for postoperative infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.