ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and disease activity outcomes in a Saudi Arabian axial spondyloarthritis cohort.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Factors Associated with Diagnostic Delay in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesReal-world data on axial spondyloarthritis from Saudi Arabia remain limited. We described the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidity burden, cumulative advanced-therapy exposure, and 12-month disease activity outcomes of a Saudi tertiary-care axial spondyloarthritis cohort.
methodWe conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including 148 patients who fulfilled international classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis and had sufficient clinical data for analysis, including paired baseline and 12-month (mean 12.2 ± 1.1 months) ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) values. Baseline was defined as the index treatment episode anchoring the paired baseline-to-12-month ASDAS-CRP assessment. Outcomes were summarized descriptively; clinically important and major improvement was defined as decreases in ASDAS-CRP of at least 1.1 and 2.0 units, respectively.
resultsMean age was 41.0 ± 12.8 years, 64.9% were male, and mean diagnostic delay was 4.3 ± 3.3 years. HLA-B27 was positive in 62.8%, numerically more often in ankylosing spondylitis than in nonradiographic disease (73.8% vs 48.4%) and in men than in women (68.8% vs 51.9%). Peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, uveitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease occurred in 39.9%, 41.2%, 17.6%, 14.9%, and 9.5%, respectively. Mean ASDAS-CRP improved from 3.30 ± 0.64 to 2.06 ± 0.66; 50.7% achieved clinically important improvement, 17.6% major improvement, and 67.6% a score below 2.1.
conclusionsThis study provides important real-world data from a large Saudi tertiary-care cohort on axial spondyloarthritis phenotype, comorbidity burden, cumulative advanced-therapy exposure, and 12-month outcomes. 67.6% of patients reached a practical disease activity target (ASDAS-CRP < 2.1), although inactive disease was achieved by a smaller subgroup (14.2%). Key Points • This study represents one of the largest published single-center Saudi cohorts of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. • Patients in this tertiary-care cohort had documented musculoskeletal, extra-musculoskeletal, and comorbidity burden, together with advanced-therapy exposure. • At 12 months, mean ASDAS-CRP decreased from 3.30 to 2.06, and 67.6% of patients achieved ASDAS-CRP < 2.1, although inactive disease was reached by a smaller subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.