ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Metabolic-inflammatory phenotypes, osteoarthritis, and lower-extremity functional limitation in US adults: a NHANES 2007-2018 study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo identify metabolic-inflammatory profiles in US adults and assess their cross-sectional associations with self-reported osteoarthritis (OA) and lower-extremity functional limitation.
methodsWe analyzed six National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles from 2007-2008 to 2017-2018. Latent class analysis used body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and log-transformed neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Survey-weighted logistic regression assessed prevalent OA in 9770 adults and lower-extremity functional limitation in 2189 adults with available Physical Functioning Questionnaire data.
resultsAmong 9770 participants, 559 met the study definition of OA. Three profiles were identified: relatively healthy, intermediate metabolic, and highest metabolic-inflammatory burden. After full adjustment, the intermediate profile was not associated with OA (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.93-1.95), whereas the highest-burden profile was associated with higher odds of OA (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.32). Among 2189 participants with functional data, 1239 had functional limitation; the highest-burden profile was associated with this outcome (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.39-4.41). Seven-indicator and leave-one-adiposity-indicator-out analyses retained positive associations for the highest-burden profile, although class distributions and intermediate-profile estimates varied.
conclusionsThe highest-burden profile was associated with prevalent self-reported OA and lower-extremity functional limitation in this nationally representative cross-sectional sample. These findings do not establish temporality or causality. Prospective studies with joint-specific OA ascertainment are needed to determine whether combined systemic risk profiling can inform prevention, rehabilitation, or risk stratification. Key Points • NHANES data identified three metabolic-inflammatory profiles among US adults. • The profile with the highest combined systemic burden was associated with prevalent self-reported osteoarthritis. • The same profile was associated with lower-extremity functional limitation among 2,189 participants with available questionnaire data. • The cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; longitudinal, joint-specific validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.