ArticleDrug safety2026
AS01
Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe AS01
methodsWe conducted a review of post-marketing safety surveillance data following adjuvanted RSVPreF3 administration. Spontaneous adverse events (AEs) that were reported worldwide since the first approval (3 May, 2023) to 2 May, 2025 in the GSK global safety database were analyzed.
resultsUp to 2 May, 2025, 13.4 million doses of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 were distributed globally. A total of 2861 spontaneous reports, including 7012 AEs (serious: 11.0%), were received. The most frequent AEs consisted mainly of non-serious reactogenic events. Of all reports, 1164 described vaccination errors, with most frequent errors consisting of either wrong product administration (N = 243) or administration to patients of an inappropriate age (N = 204). The majority (90.3%) of vaccination error reports were not associated with any other AEs. Adjuvanted RSVPreF3 was erroneously administered to pregnant individuals in 415 cases; most reports (95.2%) occurred without associated AEs. Observed-to-expected analysis of reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (N = 37) did not suggest an increased risk compared to background incidence of this event and the reports of atrial fibrillation (N = 29) did not indicate an excess risk.
conclusionsReview of the post-marketing surveillance data from 2 years of exposure to adjuvanted RSVPreF3 showed that the safety profile of the vaccine is consistent with that observed in clinical trials supporting an unchanged and favorable benefit-risk profile for the vaccine. Additional post-marketing surveillance is ongoing to further evaluate a potential risk of rare AEs, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, following adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination.
Identifiers
42541670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.