ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Scoring pesticide-likeness of organic compounds via explainable one-class machine learning.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides, especially eco-friendly biopesticides, are indispensable for crops protection and food security. In this work, we propose a scoring framework to screen or repurpose existing organic compounds, natural products and pharmaceutical drugs as sustainable agrochemicals. This scoring strategy adopts one-class support vector machine (OCSVM) as base learner to capture the patterns of pharmacophore-relevant fragments of organic compounds exhibiting pesticidal effects, in which only pesticides are required as training data, and the uncertainty and error-proneness of conventional sampling of negative training data are eliminated. T-SNE demonstrates that Morgan fingerprint is effective to transform molecule-level heterogeneity into fragment-level homogeneity to comply the requirement of OCSVM cohesive space. Furthermoe, Morgan bits are explained via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) in terms of significance, and are visualized via reverse engineering to bridge the gap between abstract representation of local chemical environments and intuitive structural fragments. Hierarchical clustering analyses show that two molecules exhibiting close substructural/fragmental similarities tend to be physically proximal in the inlier subspace, justifying the metric validity and explainability of OCSVM hyperplane distances as pesticide-likeness scores. K-fold cross validation (k = 5) shows that the OCSVM model achieves 4% novelty or outlier rate with the empirically and heuristically determined hyperparameters ([Formula: see text]). External test on 38 independent biopesticides shows that the OCSVM model recognises 92% of external biopesticides, equivalent to or better than two binary supervised classifiers (82.05% and 81.57%). Further model sanity check demonstrates that the OCSVM model has the competitive potentials of screening natural products molecules or fragments as eco-friendly biopesticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.