Observational studyInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Return to work after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: questionnaire-based observational study.
Observational study in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReturn to work (RTW) is an important component of cancer survivorship. However, evidence on RTW after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery remains limited.
methodsWe performed a questionnaire-based observational study between August 2023 and August 2025. Patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for upper gastrointestinal cancer, attended postoperative outpatient follow-up visits, and had been employed at the time of cancer diagnosis were eligible for this analysis.
resultsAmong 410 patients who completed the questionnaire, 207 had been employed at the time of cancer diagnosis. Of these 207 patients, 144 had returned to work (70%). Patients who returned to work were younger than those who did not (median age, 62.5 vs. 65.0 years; P = 0.013). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age was associated with a lower likelihood of RTW; however, this association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after further adjustment for employment status (full-time or part-time worker). The cumulative probability of self-reported RTW was significantly higher in patients aged < 65 years than in those aged ≥ 65 years (P = 0.011). Approximately 85% of patients who ultimately returned to work had resumed work by 6 months after surgery.
conclusionsMost patients who ultimately returned to work did so within 6 months after surgery. RTW after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery appears to be influenced by occupational and social circumstances; older age may serve as a proxy for these circumstances rather than an independent determinant of RTW, highlighting the potential value of individualized survivorship care and timely RTW support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.