ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
Turkish Validation of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire: Psychometric and Clinical Evidence Across Healthy, Drug-Naïve, and Remitted Medicated Depression Groups.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional blunting is a clinically significant yet often under-recognized alteration in emotional experience, characterized by reduced intensity of both positive and negative emotions, diminished emotional responsiveness, and impaired interpersonal engagement. First described through patients' reports of antidepressant treatment, it is now recognized as associated with both depressive illness and pharmacological treatment, underscoring the need for its direct assessment. However, no validated Turkish-language instrument specifically designed to assess emotional blunting is currently available. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in 272 participants comprising healthy controls, drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), and medicated patients with MDD in remission. Confirmatory factor analysis using WLSMV estimation broadly supported the proposed four-factor structure, although fit indices were not uniform. The correlated four-factor model provided a better fit than alternative one-factor, two-factor, and second-order models, although the second-order model showed only a modest decrement in fit. The scale demonstrated acceptable to high internal consistency across dimensions, and measurement invariance analyses supported loading invariance across the three groups. ODQ scores differed significantly between groups and showed the expected associations with depressive symptom severity and with emotional reactivity and empathy, which were themselves largely independent. These findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the Turkish ODQ and support its use for assessing emotional blunting across healthy, untreated, and remitted medicated populations, while indicating that further evaluation of specific items is warranted in future validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42541644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.